<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- This sitemap was dynamically generated on April 5, 2026 at 4:40 pm by All in One SEO v4.9.5.1 - the original SEO plugin for WordPress. -->

<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://argumentajuris.com/default-sitemap.xsl"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Argumentajuris</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com]]></link>
		<description><![CDATA[Argumentajuris]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Mar 2026 01:08:09 +0000]]></lastBuildDate>
		<docs>https://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/rss2.html</docs>
		<atom:link href="https://argumentajuris.com/sitemap.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<ttl><![CDATA[60]]></ttl>

		<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/02/22/202602221802/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/02/22/202602221802/]]></link>
			<title>Robert Alexy&#8217;s theory of legal argumentation</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Mar 2026 01:08:09 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/02/24/202602240825/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/02/24/202602240825/]]></link>
			<title>Basic rules ensure a minimum of rationality in argumentation</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Mar 2026 00:58:22 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/03/08/202603081150/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/03/08/202603081150/]]></link>
			<title>How to rationally distribute the burden of argumentation</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 18 Mar 2026 00:57:13 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/03/17/202603172151/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/03/17/202603172151/]]></link>
			<title>Six forms to justify norms and value judgments from Robert Alexy&#8217;s perspective</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Mar 2026 17:51:29 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/02/13/202602131219/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/02/13/202602131219/]]></link>
			<title>Standard theory of legal argumentation</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Feb 2026 18:07:41 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/03/03/202603032129/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/03/03/202603032129/]]></link>
			<title>Rationality of argumentation depends on equal argumentative rights and justifiable assertions</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 07 Mar 2026 00:47:19 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/02/16/202602160610/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/02/16/202602160610/]]></link>
			<title>Legal Interpretative arguments according to Robert Alexy</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Feb 2026 12:33:07 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/02/22/202602221739/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/02/22/202602221739/]]></link>
			<title>Evaluation of Pierluigi Chiassoni&#8217;s approach to legal interpretative directives</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Feb 2026 12:21:48 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/02/22/202602221730/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/02/22/202602221730/]]></link>
			<title>Secondary and tertiary directives for legal interpretation identified by Pierluigi Chiassoni</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Feb 2026 12:14:59 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/02/19/202602191354/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/02/19/202602191354/]]></link>
			<title>Primary directives for legal interpretation identified by Pierluigi Chiassoni</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Feb 2026 12:14:32 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/02/18/202602181229/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/02/18/202602181229/]]></link>
			<title>Directives for legal interpretation according to Pierluigi Chiassoni</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Feb 2026 12:13:47 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/about/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/about/]]></link>
			<title>About</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 17 Feb 2026 13:08:13 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/researchers/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/researchers/]]></link>
			<title>Researchers</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 12 Feb 2026 16:35:21 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/other/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/other/]]></link>
			<title>Other</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 12 Feb 2026 16:21:36 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/03/24/202603241437/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/03/24/202603241437/]]></link>
			<title>Argumentative rules that define the content of norms and value judgments according to Robert Alexy</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 02 Apr 2026 10:29:31 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/02/18/202602181221/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/02/18/202602181221/]]></link>
			<title>Evaluation of Robert Alexy&#8217;s approach to legal interpretative arguments</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Feb 2026 20:24:11 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/02/16/202602160627/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/02/16/202602160627/]]></link>
			<title>Provisional hierarchies between legal interpretative arguments according to Robert Alexy</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 22 Feb 2026 20:23:33 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/02/13/202602131207/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/02/13/202602131207/]]></link>
			<title>Purposes of this blog</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 13 Feb 2026 15:22:58 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/organizations/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/organizations/]]></link>
			<title>Organizations</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 12 Feb 2026 16:20:01 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/journals/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/journals/]]></link>
			<title>Journals</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 12 Feb 2026 16:17:54 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
					<item>
			<guid><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/04/01/202604011557/]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[https://argumentajuris.com/2026/04/01/202604011557/]]></link>
			<title>Rules of transition between general practical discourse and other types of discourse in Robert Alexy&#8217;s view</title>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 05 Apr 2026 13:32:47 +0000]]></pubDate>
		</item>
				</channel>
</rss>
